Dec
22
2011

Not a minute too soon either

I would like to say that I can feel the darkness receding but the truth is that in my Federally mandated cube farm I’m so cut off from the world’s natural processes that for the first time in a long time the growing dark as we’ve headed toward mid-winter hasn’t had that much impact on me. Yes, even though it’s midnight when I walk out of my office building I’m just so damn glad to be in the “natural” world again it really doesn’t matter. Regardless, here are this year’s charts:

From weatherunderground.com for my specific zip code. Find yours at the same place: www.wunder.com

Archaeoastronomy's visual calendar of the Equinoxes, Solstices and Cross Quarter holidays.

I am hoping by the time the summer solstice rolls around in June that I’ll be able to regularly look out a window and see the day.

Nov
15
2011

Photos of the Days

It’s more dramatic in person. Trust me.

U.S. Capitol from 3rd Street NW about 17:00 on 14 November 2011

U.S. Capitol from 3rd Street NW about 07:00 on 15 November 2011

Sep
26
2011

Rockwell had no idea

You are being watched. You might think you aren’t but you are.

I’m not talking about security cameras of which there are an astounding number: Slate.com reported in 2010 on a five year-old study done by the New York Civil Liberties Union which counted 4,176 in Manhattan below 14th street. That’s 4,176 concentrated in one-sixth of the island. The same Slate.com article reported “The initiative [in NYC] is based on London’s Ring of Steel, which launched in the 1990s in response to IRA bombings. Britons may be the most videotaped people on earth. London has some 500,000 security cameras, while Great Britain as a whole has about 4 million.”

Think about that for a minute: that’s 4 million cameras in an area smaller than the state of Oregon. Security cameras aren’t just the province of big cities any more. Speed cameras, toll booth cameras, even cameras at the fast food drive through can all be used to observe your movements. But this isn’t what I mean when I say “you’re being watched.” I mean something even more insidious. I’m talking about your filter bubble.

Wikipedia defines the filter bubble as “…a concept developed by Internet activist Eli Pariser in his book by the same name to describe a phenomenon in which websites use algorithms to selectively guess what information a user would like to see based on information about the user like location, past click behavior and search history. As a result websites tend to show only information which agrees with the user’s past viewpoint.”

Pariser’s book and website provide more insight into not only how Google and other entities track your behavior online but how the smallest interaction with an add, link, or seemingly unrelated site can accrete to form what may or may not be an accurate picture of who you are and how that picture will influence in the future what messages you see.

Contemplate an Internet where ads pop up on unrelated sites simply because you visited a merchant’s website at some point in time.

Or how about a world in which search isn’t neutral but tailored specifically to what the algorithm thinks you want to see.

Imagine a political campaign where the messages are so micro targeted that you never actually get a full picture of the candidate’s positions, only message tailored to your interests designed to sell the candidate to you.

I didn’t notice the filter bubble in effect until after I read Pariser’s book but once I started looking for it I could see it everywhere: when I search for political topics or news stories Google serves me results from particular sources slanted toward what I normally read online and quite often those results are neither the freshest or most complete; when I visit a merchant’s website invariably that merchant’s advertising shows up on other sites powered by Google ads; and then there is the fact that Google reads my gmail.

Over the weekend I emailed a friend/former coworker to follow up on a remark she made to me while we were socializing at dinner on Friday. She highly encouraged me not to just quit my demeaning, frustrating job at which I have been totally marginalized and specifically told that I am not allowed to use anything but the barest range of my skill set. No, she said, make sure you have some place to go to before you leave.

Since there was beer involved, and since I am completely exhausted pretty much all the time now, I wasn’t thinking as quickly as I should so Saturday morning this is part of what I wrote to her:

My point about “just away,” which I was not expressing well thanks to the uberpils, is that if I were in a romantic relationship where I was being gaslighted (I don’t remember things correctly), jerked around (No, I can’t have a clear definition of my role.), marginalized (So, my work assignments are things that no one gives a cr*p about and that offer no value to the American public thereby negating the whole idea of “public service.”), patronized (I’m supposed to take career and technical direction from people that don’t understand the fundamental principles of web communications? Seriously?), and just generally aggravated (I wasn’t kidding: I’ve woken up angry and thinking about work every. single. morning. for the past month. This sh*t is getting old.) on this scale no one would be saying to me “Don’t leave until you’ve found someone else to be with.”

Right after I sent that message gmail served up this advertisement:

Now tell me, how long do you think it’s going to be before I start seeing ads for relationship counselors all over the Internet? I suspect I’ll start seeing them sometime within the week.

If you’re interested in searching where you aren’t tracked try duckduckgo.com or learn visually about how your filter bubble works.

Blog title gleefully swiped from Rockwell’s 1984 single “Somebody’s Watching Me

Jun
21
2011

13:16 EDT

Courtesy weatherunderground.com

Rainy and off temperature, but still mid-summer nonetheless.

Now if I can just figure out a way to get two mid-summers in one year.

May
02
2011

Pine or Sea

I understand why people write green crayon letters about things that for the rest of us are of little or no import. Some of them write them because they are possessed of insanity of one flavor or another. The voices tell them to write these letters. They become convinced that the fate of the world hinges on some small thing they think no one else has noticed.

Some people write those green crayon letters because they see something Not Quite Right and it offends their moral sensibilities. Clearly the world would be a better place if people actually knew how to use the apostrophe or if engineers gave a single moment’s thought to how actual people really used the things they were designing and designed those things around that behavior rather than blindly thinking that behavior follows form.

But most people, I think, write those green crayon letters not because they are clinically insane or because their inner pedant has gotten out to play. Most people write green crayon letters because they’ve finally woken up to the fact that they are caught in a gigantic, unfair system with almost no power and what little power they do have would take so much time to exercise that any victory would by Pyrrhic at best.

For the new job I had to buy grown-up clothes. Admittedly, khakis and shirts with a collar aren’t all that grown-up but when you’ve spent about a decade going to work in jeans and a t-shirt the change can be a bit jarring. Because they offer it, and because I like that nice Armani break in my pants, I chose an online retailer that allowed me to order my pants in a custom hemmed length and they have dutifully performed until recently. During their first wash and dry cycle one of these pairs of pants lost an inch worth of inseam length which is fine as long as I either stay standing all the time or I don’t mind that nice band of pasty white skin between the hem of my trousers’ leg and the top of my socks when I sit down.

Now I find myself at one of those decision points: do I spent my precious time hassling with retailer-who-shall-remain-nameless over these pants that are now half an inch shorter than I’d normally buy them if custom hemming weren’t available or do I simple go on their web site and write a green crayon review of their clearly inferior product?

I’m not really sure but what I do know is the next time I order pants I’m ordering them an inch longer than I need them to be.

Feb
09
2011

Achieving cosmos

Everyone has at least one role they fill in their family. One of the roles I fill is that of entertainment bitch. In this role, I’ve now got my mother watching Sons of Anarchy which is a series whose main characters are all in some way involved with an outlaw biker club of the same name.

The club, and its members, are violent, mercenary, and largely on the wrong side of the law. Despite this, the characters as written also live by a vaguely chivalric code in which loyalty, duty, and family weigh heavily. My mother allowed as how such a code might be a tad unrealistic given that the point of being in an outlaw biker gang is to do whatever the hell you want most of the time. She doubted that the members of most real MCs had gotten more civilized since Hunter S. Thompson spent almost two years living with the Hell’s Angels in the mid-1960s given that society as a whole hasn’t gotten more civilized since then. She also advanced the opinion that maybe our behavior was just evening out and that eventually we’d all get to the “let them all go to hell except cave 7” point.

It seems to me if we reach that point of self-interest in behavior that our only two choices for the future of humanity are anarchy or fascism. [Read more...]

Feb
02
2011

Are you afraid I’m going to sell it on the street?

Now that I am 40<mumble>, I’ve reached the age where my doctor wants me to start having those specialized tests. I’ve managed to put her off about the mammogram. After all, there is no history of female specific cancers in my family and she really isn’t the right doctor to prescribe the test I need to look for the type of cancer that has hit us twice now.

I'm rushing to place a sensitive body part in that. Oh yeah!

Despite the fact that screening mammograms miss 20% of breast cancers present at the time of exam this year at my annual exam I caved. I agreed to go get my boobs squashed so they could look for suspicious lumps. But because my annual exam was at the end of October last year scheduling the test, which is recommended for a particular point in the menstrual cycle, just wasn’t going to happen with the holidays and other associated responsibilities in November and December. In fact, I just got around to making the call this week and doing so convinced me beyond a shadow of a doubt that the healthcare establishment in America not only doesn’t care if women are healthy it may even be actively trying to keep us from getting health care.

Let me say up front that I have insurance. Paying for this test will not be a problem. The prescription my ob/GYN wrote for me is dated October 28, 2010. It’s a little stale, I know, but not so stale that a general screening exam isn’t still warranted. But when I called my first choice out-patient radiology provider they wouldn’t schedule the appointment for me.

My first question about why was answered with “because it’s a prescription from last year.” I inquired about the logic of that: if I had seen my doctor on December 30, 2010 it would still be a prescription dated last year I was put on hold a perfunctory amount of time. The second response I got was equally as ridiculous: the prescription is only good for 90 days.

Ponder that for a minute. I’m 40<mumble> years old. Current thought in healthcare says that women my age should have this vital test every 1 to 2 years yet, because my prescription was 94 days old a provider was going to refuse me service.

I don’t think, though I am not positive, that insurance companies require out-patient service providers to submit the prescription when billing for these types of services. I could be wrong about this but let’s assume I’m not. If I’m not wrong, what exactly is this provider afraid I’ll do with my mammogram? It’s not like I can turn around a sell the test on the street like I could a outdated prescription for anti-anxiety medication. There is no harm in them providing me with this service and all requiring that I have a less than 90 day-old prescription does is flex their muscles by making me jump through a hoop to see my doctor again.

I am lucky: I have an easy to reach second choice for this service who was happy to book me on a 94 day old prescription but what if there wasn’t another provider? My only choice would have been to take time away from my job to get a piece of paper to satisfy some bullshit bureaucratic requirement, and it is a bullshit requirement because the need for the screening exam hasn’t changed since the prescription was written.

How is that helping women get better access to, and a better quality of, healthcare?

I’m very tempted to call the first hospital back and point out to them that their competition, because even non-profit hospitals in the U.S. are in competition for patient and insurance company dollars, which is about 15 minutes away from them by car was more than happy to book me for this test but I suspect that there is no point to that. It would only make me angry and wouldn’t teach them anything. Or maybe I’ll resort to the power of the letter. You never know; they might offer me my next mammogram free.

Jan
30
2011

Love, marriage, and status

I was thinking about Katie Holmes Thursday morning while I was shoveling snow. Strictly speaking, that’s not actually true. I wasn’t really thinking about anything but because I’d read a blurb about Michelle Williams who starred in Dawson’s Creek with Katie Holmes my brain made one of those weird leaps it makes while I’m doing repetitive work.

Speculation about Tom Cruise’s sexuality is no great secret. A relatively benign search of the Interwebs yields a wealth of theories some of which are even vaguely supported by actual evidence. When you combine the Church of Scientology’s shaky position on homosexuality with Cruise’s high ranking position in that institution, it wouldn’t be so shocking to believe that his marriage to Katie Holmes is less about love and more about business.

And from here things got weird in my brain. [Read more...]

Jan
26
2011

Shoveling a puddle

Courtesy Weatherunderground.com

DC is in the middle of its third winter weather “event” in as many weeks. In some ways, we’ve been lucky so far; the major storms that have hit the East Coast have missed us. In other ways, we really haven’t been lucky since what we’ve been getting has been just enough to need to be dealt with but not enough to either have fun in or to really justify closing anything.

This morning I spent 45 minutes shovelmopping the sidewalks I’m responsible for in my neighborhood. It was like shoveling a puddle with a thin skin of ice on top. To make matters even less satisfactory, it started to sleet while I was bent over the shovel trying to scrape half frozen water off uneven concrete. But then I noticed something.

My mother’s across the street neighbors have two old pine trees in their side yard. These aren’t squat, fat, Christmas tree looking evergreens; they’re the straight, tall, thin-needle variety. Once I stopped scraping the plastic blade of my snow shovel across the concrete to try to get under the slush I could hear the sleet hissing through the pine trees’ needles.

Even though I could still hear the din of traffic on the two nearby cross-town routes, that hiss sounded like peace for a minute, like nature subtly making itself known. In a world that largely doesn’t seem to pay attention unless nature does the equivalent of set her hair on fire and run through the family bar-b-que naked, this was a nice reminder to be mindful and to pause.

So while I’d rather have actual snow to shovel, having to shovel a puddle turned out to not be all bad.

Jan
23
2011

Failure is an acceptable option

Do or do not…there is no try. – Yoda

If the Star Wars movies don’t feature prominently in your cultural landscape, it’s possible that this is the first time you’ve seen this particular quote. I’m sure there are myriad variations of it attributed to speakers of varying degrees of credibility. Regardless, I have for most of my life hated this quote: it always read and felt to me like an implicit call to perfection which is not only impossible to achieve for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is that there is no agreed upon definition of what constitutes “perfect,” but also because perfection something it is unreasonable to expect out of anyone just beginning anything.

Basically, it seemed to me like this idea closed out the idea of learning anything new. After all, if there’s no room for mistakes, no room for just trying something, and failing, then how the hell does anyone build new skills, step out of the role to which she has been consigned by society, or learn anything new? Recently, though, I’ve come see this quote in a slightly different light. [Read more...]